Question 1

What does MVP stand for?

Accepted Answer

MVP stands for minimum viable product — the smallest version of a product that still delivers value and can be released to real users. In practice it means shipping the core feature set first and adding the rest once usage data shows what matters.

Question 2

How long does it take to develop an MVP?

Accepted Answer

A typical MVP at Purrweb takes 3–4 months from signed contract to App Store submission. The breakdown: 2 weeks for a discovery sprint (feature prioritization, architecture decisions, UX wireframes), 4–6 weeks for UI design and approval, 6–10 weeks for development and QA, then 1–2 weeks for submission and review. Timeline depends on three factors: scope complexity, number of third-party integrations (payment systems, maps, APIs add 2–4 weeks each), and how quickly the client reviews and approves deliverables. If you have seen agencies quote 4–6 weeks for a full MVP, ask what they are cutting — usually it is architecture documentation or test coverage, which creates technical debt before the product even launches.

Question 3

How much does it cost to make an MVP?

Accepted Answer

MVP development cost at Purrweb typically falls in the $30,000–$80,000 range, depending on scope. A simple consumer app with authentication, one core workflow, and a basic backend lands at the lower end. Add payment processing, real-time features, or complex integrations and you move toward the upper range. Cost drivers in order of impact: number of screens and user roles, third-party API integrations, backend complexity (simple CRUD vs. real-time data or ML features), and platform choice (one platform vs. simultaneous iOS + Android). We scope every project in a paid discovery sprint (1–2 weeks) before committing to a fixed estimate — this is how we achieve ±10% accuracy on budget. No estimate is given from a 30-minute call alone.

Question 4

Is outsourcing an MVP a good decision for startups?

Accepted Answer

For most early-stage startups, outsourcing MVP development makes more practical sense than hiring in-house. Building an in-house team of 4–5 people (developer, designer, QA, PM) takes 3–6 months of recruiting and onboarding — time that a funded startup often cannot afford before the next investor checkpoint. An outsourced team is available from day one and comes with established processes. The risks with outsourcing are real but manageable: choose a partner with a defined handoff process (source code ownership, documented architecture, repository access from day one), fixed-price or milestone-based contracts, and verifiable case studies in your product category. At Purrweb, clients own the codebase from the first commit.

Question 5

What steps do you take to protect my data? Will NDAs be signed?

Accepted Answer

NDAs are signed before any project discussion begins — this applies to discovery calls, not just the contract phase. Beyond legal agreements, data protection at the project level includes: code stored in client-owned or jointly controlled repositories, no third-party sharing of product logic or designs, and access controls scoped to the active team. After project completion, Purrweb team access to repositories and staging environments is revoked unless ongoing support is agreed. If your product operates in a regulated domain (healthcare, fintech, legal), we can align our process with HIPAA or relevant data handling standards during the discovery sprint.

Question 6

What is the difference between an MVP and a prototype?

Accepted Answer

A prototype is a design artifact — clickable screens in Figma that simulate how an app works, used to gather early feedback without writing a line of code. An MVP is a working software product with real functionality, real user accounts, and real data. Users can actually complete tasks in an MVP; in a prototype they are clicking through a simulation. The practical distinction for founders: a prototype costs $5,000–$15,000 and takes 3–6 weeks; an MVP costs $30,000–$80,000 and takes 3–4 months. Both serve different purposes — a prototype validates UX assumptions, an MVP validates whether people will pay for or repeatedly use the product.

Question 7

How do you choose the tech stack for an MVP?

Accepted Answer

Stack choice for an MVP follows one rule: use whatever gets you to validated users fastest with a codebase you can scale. For mobile MVPs, Purrweb defaults to React Native — it covers iOS and Android from a single codebase, which cuts development time by roughly 30–40% compared to building two native apps. Exceptions where we recommend native (Swift/Kotlin): apps with heavy real-time processing, AR, or hardware-level integrations where React Native's bridge introduces latency. For backend, Node.js or Python (FastAPI) handle the majority of MVP requirements; we avoid over-engineered microservice setups at this stage. Database: PostgreSQL for structured data, Firebase for real-time or rapid-prototype backends. Stack decisions are finalized in the discovery sprint, not assumed upfront.

Question 8

Can an MVP be built without a technical co-founder?

Accepted Answer

Yes — this is the most common scenario for Purrweb clients. The majority of founders who come to us with an MVP project do not have a technical background, and the product still ships. What you need instead of a technical co-founder: a clear understanding of the problem you are solving and who has it, a basic prioritization sense (what is must-have vs. nice-to-have), and the ability to make decisions on design and UX reviews. The development agency provides everything else: architecture decisions, technology choices, code quality, QA, and deployment. Where non-technical founders run into trouble is in evaluating vendor quality — ask any agency for their test coverage practices, code review process, and what happens to the repository after the project ends.

Question 9

How is an MVP different from a full-featured product?

Accepted Answer

An MVP includes only the features needed to test your core hypothesis with real users — typically one primary user flow, basic auth, and the minimum backend to support it. A full-featured product adds the features that make the app competitive long-term: advanced personalization, admin tooling, analytics dashboards, multi-role support, and polish across edge cases. Most Purrweb MVP clients ship v1 with 3–5 core features and expand from there based on what actual usage data shows — building the full feature set upfront before validating demand is the most common way startups overspend before finding product-market fit.

Question 10

How do you decide which features go into the MVP?

Accepted Answer

Feature selection happens during the discovery sprint, not before it. We map your product idea against the single hypothesis you need to test, then sort every proposed feature into must-have (blocks the core flow if missing), nice-to-have (improves the experience but doesn't block it), and later (valuable but not needed to learn from users). The test for "must-have": if you removed this feature, could a user still complete the core action the product exists for? If yes, it's cut from v1. This keeps most MVPs at 3–5 core features rather than the 15–20 a founder's initial wishlist usually contains.

Question 11

What role does market research play in MVP development?

Accepted Answer

Market research happens inside the discovery sprint, before any design or code — it's part of the "market analysis" and "competitor research" line items covered in project scoping. It answers three questions: who has this problem badly enough to use a new product, what are they using today (direct competitors and workaround tools), and where does the current market miss what they actually need. This shapes which features make it into the MVP and which claims are safe to make in your positioning — skipping this step is the most common reason an otherwise well-built MVP fails to find users.

Question 12

How is user feedback collected and used after the MVP launches?

Accepted Answer

Post-launch, feedback comes from three channels: in-app analytics on which flows users complete or abandon, direct user interviews (5–10 early users is usually enough to spot patterns), and app store reviews once you have downloads. We track this against the original hypothesis from the discovery sprint — the question isn't "do users like it" but "did they do the thing we expected them to do." This is what determines the next build cycle: double down on what's working, cut what nobody uses, and only then start layering in the features held back from v1.

Axis	Purrweb (agency)	In-house team	Freelancer
Timeline	3–4 months from signed contract to App Store submission	2–3 months just to hire the team, before development starts	Fastest to start, but no fixed delivery process
Cost	$30,000–$80,000, fixed after a paid discovery sprint	Salaries + overhead, ongoing regardless of MVP status	Cheapest upfront rate, but scope changes are billed ad hoc
Team & expertise	Dedicated PM, designer, 2–3 developers, QA — same team across the project	Full control over hiring, but takes months to reach team maturity	Single point of expertise — no built-in QA or design review
Code ownership & handover	Client owns the codebase from the first commit; documented handover	Full ownership by default — the team is your employees	Depends on the contract; repository access varies by freelancer
Risk & continuity	Team redundancy — a person leaving doesn't stop the project	Lowest external risk, but slowest and most expensive to start	No redundancy — one person's availability is a single point of failure

MVP development services

What are MVP development services?

Types of MVP development services

Project discovery

UI/UX design

Minimum Viable Product development

MVP improvement

Consulting

Prototyping

KEM — a P2P payment app

Wai Thai — a mobile app for a massage chain

GSR — a platform for consultations with psychologists

KEM — a P2P payment app

Wai Thai — a mobile app for a massage chain

GSR — a platform for consultations with psychologists

Ready to begin your journeyto MVP with us?

Benefits of MVP developmentfor startups

Saves time and resources

Checking market demand

Early market entry

Attracting investment

Our expertise

Healthcare and medtech

Marketplaces

Fintech and crypto

B2B SaaS

How we start working together

Our MVP development process

Analysis and spec

Design concept and system

Development

Quality control

Release and operation

Acceptance